Wednesday, February 14, 2018

Why the American Left Hates Russia


Why the American Left Hates Russia

Russia’s conservatism stirs hysteria and fear

By Julio Severo
China, the largest communist nation in the world, has stolen entire computer banks of information from the U.S.  government. Their new weapons systems look suspiciously like the U.S. weapon systems. China has manipulated trade markets and its currency to steal from America its wealth, and its trade secrets.
Yet, there is no U.S. hysteria against China. No U.S. sanctions or boycotts on China, which is officially atheist and communist. On the contrary, in spite of the Chinese attacks, left-wing president Barack Obama and right-wing president Donald Trump officially visited China and showed respect for its communist rulers.
In contrast, Russia, which is not atheist and communist, has been consistently accused, by the mainstream left-wing media in the U.S., of cyber intrusions during the 2016 presidential election. Obama imposed sanctions on Russia and Trump has continued the sanctions.
So if communist China’s actions are worse than Russia’s actions, why is Russia the favorite victim of attacks from the U.S. corrupt media, the Democrats, and the Left in general?
The media’s anti-Russian propaganda has been so pervasive and successful that even Trump succumbed to the pressure to change. The 2016 Trump who preached partnership with Russia against Islamic terror was replaced by a Trump, now president, who makes no compromises to Russia and has fully succumbed to the neocon swamp and its ambitions.
The United States tolerates kindly even Saudi Arabia, which has fomented Islamic terror around the world. 9/11 was committed by Saudi terrorists.
But America does not tolerate Russia.
What accounts for such extreme intolerance? The answer is very simple: Russia today embodies everything the U.S. Left hates.
Russia is Christian. In fact, Russia is the largest Christian Orthodox nation in the world. Russian Christianity is not similar to the U.S. evangelicalism. The United States is the largest Protestant nation in the world. Russian Christianity is more similar, in some traditionalistic respects, including in the worship of saints, to Catholicism.
There is a symbiotic relationship between the Russian government and the Russian Christian Orthodox Church. They help each other maintain money and power.
Writing in the Washington Times, L. Todd Wood said, “Visiting Moscow reminds me in some ways of the American South. There is a new church going up on every corner in the Russian capital. You can’t help hear the bells ringing somewhere during the day from some church or monastery nearby. The golden domes dot the landscape.”
We all know how the Left despises Christianity and enables Islam, the homosexual agenda, etc.
Russia is mostly white. Although 30 percent of Russia is Muslim, Russia tries to protect its culture by brutally repressing Islamic extremism. Russia treats its Muslim citizens and mosques just as Israel treats its Muslim citizens and mosques.
Left-wing Obama used to make derogatory comments on Russia and Putin he never did regarding communist China, such as “Russia is a regional power that doesn’t make anything” and “Putin’s school boy slouch.”
Russia is conservative in many ways. For the most part, Russian women hate feminism. They had the opportunity to experience real “equality” during Soviet times — and they didn’t like it. “Why should I want to act like a man and have to do everything?” Russian women ask. Sex roles are very defined in Russia to the horror of the cultural Marxists in the West.
You can understand the Russian conservatism by reading an exclusive interview by William J. Murray to me in 2015. Murray, who is the son of a prominent American Marxist and atheist, converted to Christ and offers today a Christian view on the current Russia.
Russia has a law banning homosexual propaganda. The law simply makes it a crime to expose homosexual propaganda to children and teens. While in Russia parents who do not want their children being indoctrinated in the homosexual lifestyle are respected, in the West generally and in America particularly, homosexuality is being crammed down children’s throats in school, over the objections of most parents.
Left-wing Obama and all the mainstream U.S. media mocked Russia and Putin because of this law. The Advocate, the most prominent homosexual magazine in the U.S. and in the world, sarcastically announced that its 2014 Person of the Year was Vladimir Putin, saying “The Russian president became the single greatest threat to LGBTs in the world in 2014.”
Russia is plagued by corruption, not much different from Brazil, the largest Catholic nation in the world. Traditionalistic Christianity seems to be prone to corruption.
However, Russia is not the Soviet Union. Russia is not looking to conquer the world — differently from U.S. neocons, who do want total global hegemony. As the largest country on the planet, Russia is just attempting to defend its geopolitical presence.
The Russia hysteria in the West is today largely driven by the American Left and can be explained in a very simple way: Russia is Christian, white and conservative… everything the Left loves to hate. This truth needs to be understood and explained to people.
American evangelicals who elected Trump and have been consistently bombarded by an anti-Russian propaganda from the left-wing media should find ways, just as Trump proposed in his 2016 campaign, to work together with Christian Russia to deal with the greatest threat to the security of America, Europe and Russia: Islamic terrorism.
With information from the Washington Times.
Portuguese version of this article: Por que a esquerda americana odeia a Rússia
Recommended Reading:

Monday, February 12, 2018

Unilever threatens to pull advertising from Facebook, Google and Twitter if they don’t tackle “toxic” content and “fake news”


Unilever threatens to pull advertising from Facebook, Google and Twitter if they don’t tackle “toxic” content and “fake news”

The problem is when left-wingers define what is toxic content and fake news

By Julio Severo
Unilever, one of the world’s largest advertisers, is threatening to pull its investment and marketing from tech giants such as Google, Facebook and Twitter if the platforms fuel “hate” and create “division” — a suspicious accusation considering the accuser’s left-wing motivation.
“As one of the largest advertisers in the world, we cannot have an environment where our consumers don’t trust what they see online,” said Unilever’s chief marketing officer Keith Weed.
Executives from Facebook and other tech companies have admitted that they could do more to combat “hate,” “abuse” and “extremism” on their platforms. Considering that these terms are never leveled at left-wing activity, the accusation of “hate,” “abuse” and “extremism” speaks volumes about the accuser. Of course, this is not to deny that there are hate, abuse and extremism among some right-wingers — the Catholic effort to rehabilitate the Inquisition through a Marxist revisionism is an example. But such extremism is rejected by the overwhelming majority of conservatives, while among left-wingers hate, abuse and extremism — the worship of Che Guevara and other communist killers — are not rejected.
“Unilever will not invest in platforms or environments that do not protect our children or which create division in society, and promote anger or hate,” Weed said. “We will prioritize investing only in responsible platforms that are committed to creating a positive impact in society.”
Weed called on the technology industry “to improve” their actions against “fake news” and “toxic” online content. The problem always is that Facebook and Unilever, dominated by left-wingers, never apply such terms to left-wing news and content.
Unilever said it is committed to tackling “gender stereotypes” in advertising and will only partner with organizations that are committed to creating “better” digital infrastructure. Better for whom? As ever, for their left-wing ideology.
“Gender stereotypes” is, in Unilever’s view, an excuse to protect children from Bible and conservative views. Actually, Unilever thinks that the lack of homosexual indoctrination makes children “unprotected.”
When Unilever says that it “will not invest in platforms or environments that do not protect our children,” it means that the only protection children need is from conservative ideas.
It is a miracle the conservative presence in Facebook, because this left-wing company is doing everything in its power to censor conservatives. And now Unilever wants Facebook to increase censorship.
Unilever was heavily criticized last year for a Dove advert, massively denounced by Facebook users, biased against mothers.
The Dove advert celebrated what Unilever sees as real moms “whose diverse parenting styles shatter stereotypes about motherhood and prove that there are no rules about how to be a parent today.”
The “real mothers” in the Dove advert were two biological men who identified as women. For Unilever, such propaganda “creates a positive impact in society.” For Unilever, two homosexual men are just as capable of being mothers as biological females are and to be a real woman is not a requirement for being a mom.
The Dove advert faced a massive backlash from users, who used extensively Facebook, Google and Twitter to denounce, through conservative articles and posts, Unilever’s propaganda against real mothers.
Now, in vengeance, Unilever is pressuring Facebook, Google and Twitter to tackle users’ backlash tools against its pro-homosexuality propagandas by banning conservative posts and the share of conservative articles.
Facebook, Google and Twitter would be more than happy to do as Unilever wishes. When these digital platforms complain of “hate,” “abuse” and “extremism” among their users, in no way they mean pictures of Muslims beheading Christians, homosexual activists reviling and mocking Christians or left-wing bigots attacking Christians who support Trump’s conservative stances. In an Orwellian misrepresentation, they mean Muslims, homosexual militants and left-wingers being attacked by Christians!
Just as a case in point, right now I am blocked on my own Facebook profile. Facebook’s justification for the block was that two posts, of 5 years ago, are now deemed “offensive,” because they had links to two articles on my blog. One article against Islamic invasion in Europe, denouncing Islamic violence. And another article exposing how homosexual groups in Brazil explore taxpayers by receiving millions to spread their immoral lifestyle.
You can read Facebook’s blatant censorship here: Why Does Facebook Harass and Censor Christians?
I have been banned for thirty days. This is the third time, in just six months, that Facebook has imposed a 30-day ban on my personal profile.
If, as Unilever wants, Facebook should do much more to tackle users who backlash against Unilever’s immoral propaganda, then will conservative users be censored, banned and expelled from Facebook?
In 2015, Faith Driven Consumer — representing 41 million Christian consumers who spend $2 trillion annually — labeled Unilever, with Microsoft and Apple, one of the companies most disrespectful to biblical worldview.
As a Facebook user, I strongly disagree with Unilever’s propaganda portraying two homosexual men as “real mothers.” I will do everything in my power, as a user on Facebook, Google and Twitter, to express my view against such perversion. And Unilever is doing everything in its power to ban my view.
Will Unilever prevail over the conservative public’ will?
Will Facebook, Google and Twitter prevail over their conservative users?
With information from FoxNews, Reuters, Charisma and BusinessInsider.
Recommended Reading:

Saturday, February 10, 2018

How God Used Three Christian Young Men to Stop an Islamic Terrorist


How God Used Three Christian Young Men to Stop an Islamic Terrorist

By Julio Severo
God empowers Christians to do the extraordinary: Three Christian young men tackled a ISIS Islamic terrorist hellbent on slaughtering passengers on a crowded train, disarmed him and saved hundreds of innocent lives in a courageous act.
Alek Skarlatos, Anthony Sadler and Spencer Stone portray themselves in the movie “15:17 to Paris.”
U.S. Air Force Staff Sgt. Spencer Stone, U.S. Army National Guard Spc. Alek Skarlatos and Anthony Sadler, a California State University student, sprinted toward El-Khazzani, a 26-year-old ISIS Islamic African terrorist, as he pointed his weapon at them on a train from Brussels to Paris on August 15, 2015.
El-Khazzani was armed with an AK-47, a pistol, a box cutter, 270 rounds of ammunition and a bottle of gasoline during the high-speed railway ride to Paris. Knowing that at any moment, the terrorist could unleash his firepower and execute him on the spot, Stone tackled El-Khazzani.
Skarlatos wrestled the terrorist’s weapon from him. But the terrorist pulled out a box cutter and began slashing Stone.
All three men fought El-Khazzani and rendered him unconscious. Stone, Skarlatos and Sadler then tended to other injured passengers on the train until paramedics and police arrived.
The three young men made international news for their heroic efforts.
The three young men give all the glory to God for placing them on the train and preparing them for that critical moment. They have been friends since they attended Freedom Christian School in California together.
The mission statement of their evangelical school says, “Freedom Christian School is committed to providing a biblically-based, academically excellent education in a nurturing, family environment so its students can effectively accomplish the purpose for which they were created and impact the world for Christ… Students will know Jesus Christ as their Savior and their Lord, will demonstrate a desire to serve Him, and will be trained to live according to His teachings.”
“The odds of our exact situation happening to us are too astronomical to believe that it was just purely chance,” Skarlatos said. “I mean, we shouldn’t be here today, to be honest. I really think God had a hand in it.”
“It’s like we were training our whole lives for that moment without even knowing about it,” he said.
Stone, a trained paramedic who said he was raised in a Christian home and attended church every Sunday, added: “God, for me, is someone who is always there, who will always have my back – whether it’s a good situation or a bad situation.
“God is not going to put you through anything you can’t handle. I think that’s what I kinda fell back on in the moment on the train. At times, we’re vessels to be used by him to do his work. And it was an honor to do something that good. … I just want to earn the life we’ve been given by God.”
Anthony Sadler, who is the son of a Baptist minister, said he believes God not only put them there to save lives, He also planned use the men to spread His message.
“I feel like we’re just affirming God’s plan for our lives by being where we’re supposed to be on the train that day and just the things that have happened since. It’s all just another step in the bigger plan that we’re just not aware of,” Sadler said.
“As far as on the train that day, you can’t almost deny that God had his hand on us because so many things could have gone the other way. It’s divine intervention. I feel like we were meant to spread the story, and it’s meant to touch people.”
Now Hollywood director Clint Eastwood is, in partnership with Warner Bros., retelling their story in the new film “The 15:17 to Paris,” which was released in theaters on February 9. Eastwood enlisted the three heroes to play themselves in the film, which has more filthy language and partying than families anticipate.
According to Plugged In, in the film the three Christians are frequently shown drinking beer, misusing the name of Jesus and using profanity. They are shown drunk in a night club in Amsterdam, which is the European capital city of legal prostitution and drug availability.
In the film, all three guys get exceedingly intoxicated knocking down multiple shots of liquor. You see them groggily waking up at noon the next day (in their hotel room) complaining about their hangovers. Spencer smokes a cigarette in one scene where he makes a rather profound statement, and one of his buddies jokes about what he really might be smoking.
There is an obvious conflict between their Christian testimony and what the film shows. Perhaps such conflicted testimony is helpful to show that God is merciful when troubled victims remember Him in critical moments, and the Islamic attack was a very critical moment.
If God can use three imperfect Christians from America, the largest Protestant nation in the world, to stop an Islamic terrorist, it is obvious that He can use America herself to stop a very large number of Islamic terrorists.
So why is not He doing it? Because America has other plans and, governmentally, she is not behaving with Christian motivations.
In fact, because mainly of NATO’s misguided policies, Islamic terrorists have invaded Europe, where the three young Americans suffered the attack.
Let us get the facts straight.
Europe is under the protection of NATO, which was created by the U.S. government.
So NATO should have as its absolute priority to protect Europe from Islamic invasion, but it is not doing it because it does not want to antagonize Saudi Arabia, the Sunni Islamic dictatorship which is a powerful ally of the United States. The overwhelming majority of Islamic invaders in Europe are Sunni.
NATO has not taken its responsibility to protect Europe from Islamic invaders, but it has been responsible for the current massive wave of invasions.
* Under left-wing U.S. president Bill Clinton, NATO bombed Christian Orthodox Serbia to create an Islamic enclave, Kosovo, in the 1990s. This enclave, created by NATO and America, is an open door in Europe for multitudes of Islamic terrorists and all kind of trafficking.
* Under left-wing U.S. president Barack Hussein Obama, NATO attacked Libya, and as a direct result of this illegal military intervention, made exclusively to please Saudi Arabia, Libya is today a passage point for multitudes of African Muslims invading Europe. Before NATO’s attack, Libya was a hindrance for such invasion. After the attack, Libya has been under influence of ISIS and other Islamic terrorist groups. As a State Secretary, Hillary Clinton helped to send arms from Libya, through CIA operations, to Sunni terrorists in Syria to overthrow the Syrian government and slaughter Christians.
* Even though not yet directly attacked by NATO, Syria has been a victim of illegal military operations, including from CIA, firstly under the Obama administration and now under the Trump administration. U.S. conservative pundits as Ann Coulter have condemned such illegal interventions. In Trump’s case, Coulter has reminded that for years Trump clearly condemned Obama for intervening in Syria and promised not to imitate Obama. Under Obama, Syrian Islamic terrorists were funded and armed to overthrow the Syria government. Such invasive and illegal policy continues under Trump.
The act of the three American Christians was heroic. But NATO’s actions, spurred by the U.S., have not been heroic.
Three American Christians gave a beautiful example to America, as far as their fight against a terrorist is concerned. God can use America’s Christianity to fight and defeat Islamic terror. But first America should change her policy of supporting Saudi Arabia by funding, training and arming Sunni terrorists. Such policy is anti-Christian, because in the Middle East and Africa, Sunni Muslims slaughter scores of Christians. In fact, ISIS, which Trump said in 2016 was created by Obama, is fully Sunni and a machine of Christian genocide.
A truly Christian attitude against Islamic terror is for America under Trump:
* to leave her illegal operations and presence in Syria and make reparations for the years of illegal American interventions in Syria.
* to arm Christian populations in Syria and Iraq that were victims of ISIS. If under Obama CIA operations armed Sunni Muslims to slaughter Christians in Syria and Iraq, why cannot under Trump CIA operations arm Christians to defend themselves? This is fair reparation.
* to work to abolish the Islamic enclave to Kosovo and make reparations to Christian Serbia.
* to guide NATO to protect Europe from the invasion of Sunni Muslims. If Saudi Arabia and Turkey are displeased with this security arrangement, America should shun these Islamic “allies” and expel Turkey from NATO. In fact, what is Islamic Turkey doing in NATO?
America does not like illegal invasions in her own borders. So why has she supported and done such illegal interventions in other nations? As Jesus said, “Always do for other people everything you want them to do for you.” (Matthew 7:12 GWV)
America under Trump can choose to continue the disastrous plan of appeasing Saudi Arabia by letting Europe unprotected, under NATO’s nose, from Islamic invaders, or can guide NATO to attack and defeat Islamic terrorists, including those whom American has funded, trained and armed for a long time.
America can and should fund, train and arm Christians in the Middle East for self-defense against Islamic violence. The three American heroes subdued a ISIS terrorist because they trusted God and because they had been trained by the U.S. military. Christians in the Middle East need the same training. They need U.S. arms.
While the three Christian young men from America were used by God to hinder an Islamic terrorist in 2015 in an Europe unprotected by NATO, America under Obama was actively encouraging such terrorists through misguided and perverted policies. God can and want to change such course. He can transform America from a nation that equips Islamic terrorists to a nation that defeats them.
The God who used the three American Christians against Islamic terror can use America too.
The three Christian young heroes are an example and model for America, which should fund, train, equip and arm Christians against the Islamic terror machine.
Three young men impacted the world because they were educated in evangelical Christian principles, even though they had a hard time to live out these principles! But they remembered God in the critical moment.
Only Jesus Christ can do a transformation in the U.S. government.
With information from WND (WorldNetDaily) and Plugged In.
Recommended Reading:

Thursday, February 08, 2018

Facebook excludes Israel and Includes Palestine


Facebook excludes Israel and Includes Palestine

By Julio Severo
Facebook should stop its shameful exclusion of Israel. This is the view of New York State Assemblyman Dov Hikind (D-Brooklyn), who says that, when creating a background profile, Facebook gives users 50 nationality options. These options, he claims, include Palestine, but Israel is conspicuously absent.
“Palestine is not even a country,” said Hikind. “How did it end up as an option? Well, we all know the answer to that.”
“Mark Zuckerberg has been quoted as saying, ‘As a Jew, my parents taught me that we must stand up against attacks on all communities.’ I am calling on Mr. Zuckerberg to get to the bottom of this attack on Jews and Israelis. The exclusion of Israel from Facebook, a publicly traded company, while Palestine is included is no accident—it’s a purposeful, racist insult that must be addressed immediately.”
Often the worst enemies of the Jews are… the Jews themselves. Even though his stand against Facebook’s anti-Israel attitude is commendable, Hikind is a Jewish politician of the Democratic Party, which is not a friend of Israel as far as the Bible is concerned. Traditionally, the Democratic Party, of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, is hostile to Israel. Even so, traditionally the Jewish population in the United States overwhelmingly supports the Democratic Party.
So Zuckerberg is not the only American Jew who is treacherous to Israel. Other examples of treacherous Jews are:
* Karl Marx, one of the most famous Jews in the history, was anti-Jew by defending Marxism, which is fundamentally against the Jewish Scriptures. He was a Jew who denied his Jewish roots.
* George Soros, a capitalist-socialist Jewish billionaire, has invested in every anti-Israel cause. He has also denied his Jewish roots.
* Henry Kamen, one of the most famous revisionist Jews, has been anti-Jew by defending the revisionism of the Inquisition, which is fundamentally against the massive Jewish bibliography on the Inquisition. He has also denied his Jewish roots.
This is nonsense, because the owner of Facebook, who is an American Jew who lives in the largest Protestant nation in the world, knows that Jews and evangelicals are major victims of Islam. So why favor Islam? Why censor me, a Brazilian evangelical who defends Israel? Why censor me, a Brazilian evangelical who defends Christians who are victims of systematic Islamic violence?
The answer is simple: If Facebook can exclude Israel, it can censor any pro-Israel evangelical.
With information from Israelnationalnews.
Portuguese version of this article: Facebook exclui Israel e inclui Palestina
Recommended Reading on Facebook:

Sunday, January 28, 2018

Why Does Facebook Harass and Censor Christians?


Why Does Facebook Harass and Censor Christians?

By Julio Severo
On January 28, 2018, Facebook blocked my account (https://www.facebook.com/julio.severo), for 30 days, for a professional exposé on how homosexualist groups abuse millions of Brazilian taxpayers’ money and for my support for Norway’s efforts to deport Muslim criminal immigrants.
The latest block came on the heels of another 30-day block, begun on December 10 and ended on January 9, for a comment about loving sinners.
Why a 30-day block following a 30-day block? What is the reason for the latest block?
According to the January 28 communication Facebook gave me,
We Removed Something You Posted
It looks like these posts don’t follow our Community Standards.
The translated posts mentioned by Facebook are these:
1) Serious exposé on the Brazilian homosexual movement. Thanks to the collaboration and sacrifice of many readers and friends, the first major exposé on the misuse of public funds by well-known homosexual activists is ready. Spread this exposé to all your friends and leaders of goodwill! http://bit.ly/1cCBiMg
This post, which Facebook removed and used as a pretext to block my account, was published on August 2013. Almost 5 years ago! Facebook has resurrected an old post, which is entirely journalistic and was professionally produced, to use it for its latest block.
2) Newly elected conservatives in Norway are expelling Islamic criminals: http://bit.ly/1fJfApI
This other post, which Facebook removed and used as a pretext to block my account, was published on February 2014. Four years ago! Facebook has also resurrected this old post to use it for its latest block.
The resurrection of these two old posts shows Facebook’s abusive behavior. There are thousands of similar conservative posts on my account and if Facebook follows this pattern of harassment, bullying and censorship, it can use any old post to block more times me or even terminate my account.
After showing my two old posts as its reason to block my account, Facebook’s communication said,
You’re Temporarily Blocked From Posting
This temporary block will last 30 days, and you won’t be able to post on Facebook until it’s finished.
If you post something that goes against our standard again, your account will be blocked for another 30 days.
Please keep in mind that people who repeatedly post things that aren’t allowed on Facebook may have their accounts permanently disabled.
With its latest block, using old posts, Facebook is clearly showing that conservative views are not tolerated in its environment. It is showing that it has no willingness to give his users safety and freedom for conservative views.
Facebook could have read my exposé on the homosexualist movement in Brazil and conclude that this document is journalistic and professional, just denouncing how homosexualist groups explore and abuse Brazilian taxpayers’ money. There is no improper language or personal attacks. Just sheer professional information.
On Norway deporting Muslim criminals, why Facebook’s fuss? If Muslims rape and commit other crimes in Norway, cannot they be deported? Cannot I report their deportation? Cannot I support Norway’s efforts to deport Muslim criminals?
I am an evangelical Christian. As far as Muslims are concerned, evangelicals are victims. There is no nation of evangelical majority where Muslims are persecuted. In contrast, there is no nation of Islamic majority where evangelicals are not persecuted.
In the same way, there is no nation of evangelical majority where homosexuals are tortured and murdered by evangelicals. In contrast, there is no nation of Islamic majority where homosexuals are not tortured and murdered by Muslims.
So my view is not only conservative. It is also the view of a vulnerable religious group that is victim of rapes, robbery and murders in Muslim nations.
In Muslim nations, the evangelical voice is silenced. Why is Facebook imitating Muslim nations and silencing a conservative evangelical voice?
If Facebook thinks that my professional exposé of homosexual groups abusing Brazilian taxpayers’ money is wrong, disprove it.
If Facebook thinks that my conservative view on Norway deporting Muslim criminals is wrong, disprove it.
Censorship is not a proper answer to conservative views on the homosexual greed for taxpayers’ money and Islamic violence. Censorship is the normal answer from dictatorial systems.
Facebook is a U.S.-based company and it should behave according to its American nature. Censorship is not a part of American tradition, clearly founded on Protestant principles, the same Christian values I have and I cherish. Facebook has greatly benefited from the freedom and prosperity Protestants, who were an overwhelming majority in America’s foundation, gave to the U.S. Facebook should show some gratitude to evangelicals for the sake of the U.S. Founders, including George Washington, who were Protestant.
If Facebook has received freedom in the largest Protestant nation in the world, why cannot Facebook give, in return, freedom to evangelicals? Even when there is no direct blocks on my account, my comments and interactions on Facebook have been treated as spam and deleted. People often are blocked from sharing my posts. Shadow banning on Facebook?
If Facebook has not been a victim of harassment, bullying and censorship in the largest Protestant nation in the world, why has Facebook made me, an evangelical Christian, a victim of its harassment, bullying and censorship?
I ask Christians around the world to help me, through prayers and support, fight Facebook’s censorship, harassment and bullying against my conservative Christian stances.
If you can help, contact me here: juliosevero@hotmail.com
Pressure works. Last July, the California-based Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund sent an official legal letter to the Facebook lawyers threatening legal action after Facebook removed a post by me and blocked me for 30 days.
After the threat, Facebook said,
“A member of our team accidentally removed something you posted on Facebook. This was a mistake, and we sincerely apologize for this error. We’ve since restored the content, and you should now be able to see it.”
Portuguese version of this article: Por que o Facebook atormenta e censura os cristãos?
Recommended Reading on Facebook:
Other recommended Reading:
Recommended Reading on the U.S. Left against Julio Severo: